There are very few federal laws that libertarians won’t oppose, therefore perhaps it shouldn’t come as a shock that groups of that leaning have generally come out against a ban that is nationwide of gambling. But a coalition of libertarian groups have had specially harsh words for the proposed ban, saying it could set a precedent that is dangerous how the online is regulated.

In a letter signed off on by ten libertarian-leaning groups, the bill was called ‘an improper and unnecessary use of federal powers that infringes on the liberties of individuals and states.’ That letter was sent to your leaders of both the home and Senate Judiciary Committees previously this week.

Ban Would Hurt Consumers

Like a number of other groups which have come away against the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (also referred to as H.R. 4301), the coalition argued that a ban would cause more harm than good for customers.

‘they wrote as we have seen in the past, a ban will not stop online gambling. ‘Prohibiting states from legalizing and regulating the practice just helps to ensure that it will back be pushed into the shadows where crime can thrive with little oversight. In this black market, where virtually all sites are operated from abroad, consumers have little to no protection from predatory behavior.’

The teams that signed off on the page additionally echoed statements made by organizations like the National Council of Legislators from Gaming States, who stated that the ban would represent federal overreach in areas traditionally kept to the states. In addition, they questioned whether the national government should regulate the world wide web therefore heavily.

‘By banning a choose type of Web commerce, the federal government is setting a troubling precedent and providing fodder to those who want to see increased Internet legislation in the future,’ the letter claimed.

Selecting Winners and Losers

The signatories also claimed that the ban was not a fair application of government power since the law would include carve-outs for some horse racing and lottery products.

‘This amounts to the government picking winners and losers choosing selected industries or private-sector businesses to succeed at the expense of other people, which is at chances with free-market competition,’ they wrote.

The teams signing the page included FreedomWorks, the Institute for Liberty, the Taxpayer Protection Alliance plus the Alliance for Freedom.

Report Misrepresented by Both Sides, Author Says

The letter comes at a time whenever both sides regarding the online gambling debate are working hard to make their instance. So very hard, in fact, that the authors of one major report say both factions have misused the information they supplied week that is last.

That report titled ‘Jackpot! Money Laundering Through Online Gambling’ was released by McAfee, and both sides immediately tried to use its conclusions to aid their cause.

Sheldon Adelson’s Coalition to Stop Internet Gaming said that the report proved that Internet gambling shall lead to money laundering efforts from crooks and terrorists. Meanwhile, the Coalition for Consumer and on line Protection, which opposes the ban, said so it revealed that such schemes could just be stopped by managing the industry instead of outlawing it.

According to report writer Raj Samani, however, his paper suggests neither of those things.

‘For every licensed on the web gambling site, there might be up to nine unlicensed gambling that is online,’ Samani had written, suggesting that exactly what America does when it comes to Internet gambling could have only a very small effect on the problem of cash laundering.